بررسی روایی و پایایی نسخۀ فارسی مقیاس اضطراب آسیب ورزشی (PSIAS)

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناسی ارشد حرکات اصلاحی و آسیب‌شناسی ورزشی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

2 استاد دانشکدۀ تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

3 استادیار دانشکدۀ تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران و استادیار دانشکدۀ تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران

4 استادیار دانشکدۀ تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

چکیده

هدف از پژوهش حاضر بررسی ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی نسخۀ فارسی مقیاس اضطراب آسیب ورزشی در ورزشکاران بود. نسخۀ اصلی پرسشنامه، دارای هفت خرده‌مقیاس و 29 سؤال پنج‌ارزشی لیکرتی است. 300 پرسشنامه توسط ورزشکاران 19 تا 34 ساله (2/62 درصد مرد و 8/37 درصد زن با میانگین سنی 4/24 سال) که در رشته‌های مختلف ورزشی فعالیت داشتند، تکمیل شد. برای برآورد روایی سازۀ مقیاس از تحلیل عاملی تأییدی استفاده شد. همسانی درونی نیز با استفاده از ضریب آلفای کرونباخ محاسبه شد. همچنین، برای بررسی پایایی زمانی از ضریب همبستگی درون‌طبقه‎ای استفاده شد. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که نسخۀ فارسی مقیاس اضطراب آسیب ورزشی، از ساختار اصلی حمایت می‌کند و روایی و پایایی نسخۀ فارسی مقیاس اضطراب آسیب ورزشی با 28 سؤال (حذف سؤال 24) تأیید می‌شود. با توجه به نتایج به‌دست‌آمده نسخۀ فارسی مقیاس اضطراب آسیب ورزشی به‌عنوان ابزاری روا و پایا برای سنجش نوع و میزان اضطراب آسیب ورزشی ورزشکاران توصیه می‌شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Validity and Reliability of Persian Version of Sport Injury Anxiety Scale (PSIAS)

نویسندگان [English]

  • rohallah gahvare 1
  • reza rajabi 2
  • shahnaz shahrbanian 3
  • hassan gharayagh zandi 4
1 M.Sc. in Corrective Exercises and Sport Injuries, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Sport Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran/ Assistant Professor, Faculty of Sport Science, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
4 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of Persian version of Sport Injury Anxiety Scale in athletes. The original scale had 7 subscales and 29 items in 5-point Likert Scale. 300 questionnaires were completed by 19-34-year-old athletes (%62.2 male, %37.8 female with the mean age of 24.4 years old) who took part in different sport fields. To assess the construct validity of the scale, confirmatory factor analysis was used. The internal consistency was estimated by Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. Interclass correlation coefficient was also used to examine temporal reliability. The results showed that the Persian version of PSIAS supported the main framework. The validity and reliability of the Persian version of Sport Injury Anxiety Scale with 28 items (item 24 was omitted) were confirmed. According to the obtained results, the Persian version of Sport Injury Anxiety Scale can be recommended as a reliable and valid tool to assess the type and amount of athletes’ anxiety of sport injuries.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Injury
  • Persian version of Sport Injury Anxiety Scale
  • reliability
  • sport injury anxiety
  • Validity
1.   Crossman J. Psychological rehabilitation from sports injuries. Sports medicine. 1997;23(5):333-9.

2.   Ford IW, Gordon S. Perspectives of sport trainers and athletic therapists on the psychological content of their practice and training. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. 1998;7(2):79-94.

3.   Hägglund M, Waldén M, Bahr R, Ekstrand J. Methods for epidemiological study of injuries to professional football players: developing the UEFA model. British journal of sports medicine. 2005;39(6):340-6.

4.   Podlog L, Eklund RC. A longitudinal investigation of competitive athletes' return to sport following serious injury. Journal of applied sport psychology. 2006;18(1):44-68.

5.   Heil J. Psychology of sport injury: Human Kinetics Publishers; 1993.

6.   Johnston LH, Carroll D. The context of emotional responses to athletic injury: a qualitative analysis. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. 1998;7(3):206-20.

7.   Andersen MB, Williams J. Returning to action and the prevention of future injury. Coping with sports injuries: Psychological strategies for rehabilitation. 2001:162-73.

8.   Bianco T, Malo S, Orlick T. Sport injury and illness: elite skiers describe their experiences. Research quarterly for exercise and sport. 1999;70(2):157-69.

9.   Cassidy CM. Development of a measure of sport injury anxiety: The sport injury appraisal scale. 2006.

10. Driediger M, Hall C, Callow N. Imagery use by injured athletes: a qualitative analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2006;24(3):261-72.

11. Gallagher BV, Gardner FL. An examination of the relationship between early maladaptive schemas, coping, and emotional response to athletic injury. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology. 2007;1(1):47-67.

12. Gould D, Udry E. The psychology of knee injuries and injury rehabilitation. Rehabilitation of the injured knee. 1994:86-98.

13. Gould D, Bridges D, Udry E, Beck L. Stress sources encountered when rehabilitating from season-ending ski injuries. The Sport Psychologist. 1997;11(4):361-78.

14. Kvist J, Ek A, Sporrstedt K, Good L. Fear of re-injury: a hindrance for returning to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy. 2005;13(5):393-7.

15. Podlog L, Eklund RC. Return to sport after serious injury: a retrospective examination of motivation and psychological outcomes. Journal of sport rehabilitation. 2005;14(1):20-34.

16. Tripp DA, Stanish W, Ebel-Lam A, Brewer BW, Birchard J. Fear of reinjury, negative affect, and catastrophizing predicting return to sport in recreational athletes with anterior cruciate ligament injuries at 1 year postsurgery. Rehabilitation Psychology. 2007;52(1):74.

17. Weinberg RS, Gould D. Foundations of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 6E: Human Kinetics; 2014.

18. Chase MA, Magyar TM, Drake BM. Fear of injury in gymnastics: Self-efficacy and psychological strategies to keep on tumbling. Journal of sports sciences. 2005;23(5):465-75.

19. Williams J, Roepke N. Psychology of injury and injury rehabilitation. Handbook of research on sport psychology. 1993:815-39.

20. Petitpas A, Danish S. Caring for injured athletes. Sport psychology interventions. 1995:255-81.

21. Williams J, Rotella R, Heyman S. Stress, injury, and the psychological rehabilitation of athletes. Applied sport psychology: Personal growth to peak performance. 1998:409-28.

22. Williams JM, Andersen MB. Psychosocial antecedents of sport injury: Review and critique of the stress and injury model'. Journal of applied sport psychology. 1998;10(1):5-25.

23. Arvinen-Barrow M, Walker N. The psychology of sport injury and rehabilitation: Routledge; 2013.

24. Walker N, Thatcher J, Lavallee D. A preliminary development of the Re-Injury Anxiety Inventory (RIAI). Physical Therapy in Sport. 2010;11(1):23-9.

25. Taylor J, Taylor S. Psychological approaches to sports injury rehabilitation: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1997.

26. Hambleton R, Sireci S, Robin F. Adapting credentialing exams for use in multiple languages. CLEAR Exam Review. 1999;10(2):24-8.

27. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Guilford publications; 2015.

28. Martens R, Burton D, Vealey RS, Bump LA, Smith DE. Development and validation of the competitive state anxiety inventory-2. Competitive anxiety in sport. 1990:117-90.

29. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D, Wallentin FY. Latent variable scores and observational residuals. Retrieved June. 2006;7:2009.

30. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS, Osterlind SJ. Using multivariate statistics. 2001.

31. Hu Lt, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal. 1999;6(1):1-55.

32. Satorra A, Bentler PM, editors. Scaling corrections for chi-square statistics in covariance structure analysis. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association; 1988: Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.